- Serial code for adobe coldfusion builder full#
- Serial code for adobe coldfusion builder software#
- Serial code for adobe coldfusion builder free#
In any business (the software industry seemingly being the exception), you develop a product and when it’s ready – provides the features and benefits you advertise - you release it you do not take your customers’ money before then. If you came to eat there and ordered veal scallops and I was out of those that day, I would not keep my mouth shut, serve you sliced turkey breast and assume you would be stupid enough not to notice (although that sort of thing is more prevalent than the public thinks) I would tell you up front “we are out of veal”, thus giving you the option of selecting something else or walking out, even if I lost a sale, or even a customer. I am a former chef/restaurateur and got involved in software (which made me realize a menu is not a list of dishes) because I wanted my restaurant site to be like my food, i.e.
My issue is not specifically the lack of formatting: this thread caught my eye and I saw it as a good chance to comment in general on how our intelligence is being insulted by Adobe. If I did not think highly of these products, I wouldn’t be bothering with all this writing. Preface: I have been a CFer (and a fan of Charlie Arehart) since the product was called Allaire ColdFusion, and have been using Dreamweaver, Fireworks, Flash et al since version 2. otherwise it just makes me thinking more to switch to groovy/grails as some colleagues just do now. Thus as a Adobe customer who buys many server licenses and convince many customers to follow the ColdFudion path I expect a decent editor at a decent price.
Serial code for adobe coldfusion builder full#
No other editor can do full script cfc at this time with code completion and code coloring (please correct me, if I'm wrong here and miss an editor which can do script based cfc).
When you look at the feature of IntelliJ in the java world and than compare prices.Īs a CF developer you depend quite a bit on CFbuilder - at least when you do CF9 development.
Serial code for adobe coldfusion builder free#
Nobody would blame Adobe if it would be a free or very low priced editor. Why not be honest and just say sorry, we couldn't wait longer to go public thus we hat to skip probably unstable features. The missing code formatter features is major lapse. Despite the product name, he's a CF guy and his docs and video intro show using it with CF and Eclipse/CFbuilder.įirst of all I adore Charlie, he is great person and I always like to see him presenting CF stuff.īut we should not do marketing here. I will say, in conclusion, that if one really did buy it and now misses this, it can be added through a low-cost extra program which, while not an Eclipse plug-in per se, does work nicely with it (and CFBuilder). At least it may help some with the debate.Īs for choosing not to buy simply because it lacks this one feature, well, that's a personal decision I suppose. I don't presume everyone will be persuaded by the arguments, but that's ok. I mean, I suppose it could, but then that just seems like whining, if I'm being honest.Īs for the question of "is it worth it" before buying it, that's certainly a larger question and has been addressed by two recent blog entries: The sudden discovery of a lack of some feature shouldn't then detract from the value that motivated the purchase. You bought it based on what you percieved the value to be when you bought it. If one did that, and bought it, and then the next day found this missing, should they have a right to return it? Um, no. One would more prudently decide whether to buy something after using the evaluation, which is in this case 60 days. In any case, there's also no number of days where you can return it (that I know of, for really most any software for sale). Are you saying *you* bought CFB and are annoyed now that it doesn't have formatting? No one else said that (nor did you). He gave you a straight answer to the question. No, it's not a joke, Cheftimo.Hemant is indeed on the engineering team.